Just prior to the Civil War commercial buildings began replacing the staid old homes of Broadway below Houston Street. In 1860 the two matching white marble structures at Nos. 591 and 593 Broadway were completed. With modified Italian Renaissance touches like robust arched pediments over the central windows of the second and third floors they rose five stories to a shared, bracketed cornice. Stone quoins ran down the sides of the buildings. Merchant tailors Alonzo R. and William H. Peck established their business in No. 591. While the brothers sold apparel to its well-heeled clients, two other brothers, Henry and Edward Anthony, were establishing themselves elsewhere as leaders in a new technology: photography. Although both of the Anthony brothers had been educated at Columbia College as engineers, neither was satisfied with his profession. Both men worked on the Croton Aqueduct—the engineering marvel that brought fresh drinking water to Manhattan. Before the completion of the project James Renwick called upon Edward to assist him in a survey of the northeastern boundary of the United States. There was, at the time, a dispute between Great Britain and the U.S. regarding the Canadian border. Edward Anthony had been for sometime fascinated with the “new art of making pictures with the aid of sunlight, just introduced by Daguerre,” as explained in “America’s Successful Men of Affairs” later, in 1895. During the survey Anthony took photographs of the terrain, documenting hills along the boundary line that England denied existed. The resulting proof ended the controversy and was the first example of photography being used to settle diplomatic disputes. Upon his return to New York, Edward Anthony went into the business of supplying photographic materials to the trade in 1842. Henry, all the while, bounced around trying to find himself. After the Croton project he entered banking, working in the Bank of the State of New York. He left that position to return to engineering, working on the New York section of the Hudson River Railroad. The American Bookseller recalled “Tiring of that, he again entered the business of banking, and remained in it until 1852, when he joined his brother in dealing in photographic materials.” Edward’s firm, which now became E. & H. T. Anthony & Co., had already become the largest manufacturer of photographic materials in the world. By 1870 the company took over the entire building at No. 591 Broadway and operated a chemical works in Jersey City, and had three factories for the manufacture of cameras and other apparatus in Brooklyn, Hoboken and New York. In addition, the firm published periodicals such as Anthony’s Photographic Bulletin.
The two buildings at Nos. 591 and 593 were mirror-images in 1895 — King’s Handbook of the United States (copyright expired)
The Bulletin was aimed at photographers. The Inland Printer said of it, “Every issue copiously illustrated. Practical articles on process work and on photography by practical men.” On a Wednesday afternoon in October 1884, Henry T. Anthony left No. 591 Broadway heading to his home at No. 108 Lexington Avenue. He decided to make a quick stop at 17th Street and 4th Avenue and, while crossing the street, had to bolt out of the way of an oncoming horse car. The 70-year old bachelor took a hard fall onto the pavement and was seriously injured. The doctors at New York Hospital had him taken to his residence as “it was known that his injuries were fatal,” said The American Bookseller the next week. With his death, Edward was once again the sole principal. It was a time when photography was for professionals only. Not only were the supplies expensive, but the equipment was ungainly and the process complicated. That was soon to change.
A fascinating view of Broadway and the twin buildings was depicted on a stereopticon slide produced by E. and H. T. Anthony. image courtesy of Ronald K. Edge On August 18, 1885 The New York Times reported on revolutionary developments.
“The progress which has been made of late years in the science of photography has been something remarkable—the modes of posing are as different as can possibly, while the apparatus employed have been changed and improved in a high degree. The photographer of the old school fixed the person to be taken in front of a sort of ‘bull’s-eye’ and requested him or her to ‘look natural.’ Then, after a half hour of fixing and twisting, the cap was taken off the bull’s-eye, and a minute or more of torture followed, in which the sitter gazed fixedly at nothing. The result is well known to all.”
But now, said the article, E. & H. T. Anthony’s “Detective” camera changed all that. The comparatively lightweight camera operated by means of a modern shutter, allowing photographs to be “literally taken ‘on the wing.’” The Times called it “the lightest, neatest, and most compact camera ever made.” The process of taking a picture was like nothing before. “When needed for use it is only necessary to insert a ‘plate,’ a little catch is raised, a ‘click’ is heard, and quick as the twinkling of an eye the view is secured. There is no trouble, and scarcely any mechanical skill is exercised.”
With the new device E. & H. T. Anthony had made amateur photography possible. Tourists found the new plaything indispensable–to the point that the firm was unable to keep up with the demand. In 1891 The Illustrated American urged tourists to contact the company in preparation for their vacation. “For twenty-five dollars, Anthony, of 591 Broadway, can give you an excellent photographic equipment for your trip With the camera, tripod, and box of plates they sell the chemicals prepared for use, so that, by the aid of an instruction-book, you can gather enough information to teach you the camera’s use.”
Along with its cameras, the firm sold everything related to the field: portable dark rooms, photographic films, sensitized papers and “amateur photographic outfits,” among them.
Professional photographers could purchase the above stereopticon camera, for making three-dimensional slides –The School Journal 1897 (copyright expired)
On December 14, 1888 Edward Anthony died. His son, Richard A became secretary of the firm which continued under the presidency of Vincent M. Wilcox.
In 1895 “King’s Handbook of the United States” noted that “The universally popular interest in photographic art, which is so marked a feature of the present day, depends largely on apparatus and supplies devised or introduced by E. & H. T. Anthony & Co., preeminent in all the world as manufacturers and sellers of all photographic materials.”
While easier to transport, the cameras were still expensive in 1896. The $60 spent on a Marlborough would equal over $1,000 today–McClure’s Magazine (copyright expired) After three decades in the building, on December 15, 1899 E. & H. T. Anthony advertised its “removal sale” in the New York Tribune. Although the firm would continue to do limited business here until around 1904, the bulk of the building was taken over by The Strobel & Wilken Co., importers and dealers in toys.
In March 1900 No. 591 Broadway was sold at auction to William Cohen, of Cohen, Endel & Co., for a bid of $157,500. Three months later the new owners announced their intentions to “make elaborate alterations to the building, including an additional story,” as reported in The New York Times.
The report was not exaggerated. All traces of the old marble building above the ground floor—which had been modernized along with its neighbor around 1895—were wiped away and a fantastical, updated façade installed. Slender cast iron piers rose through the four central floors affording extensive expanses of glass.
The new sixth floor which sat above a decorated cast iron entablature was frosted with terra cotta ornamentation. Above the rows of arched windows rose a brick pediment covered in terra cotta.
The toy dealer would remain here for fifteen years, followed by apparel firms as the dry goods and millinery industry firmly implanted itself in the neighborhood. In 1916 Nelson, Siegel and Company was here manufacturing ladies’ hats. By 1920 shirt manufacturers Nibenberg & Saltzman had its offices here. The sizable firm turned out about 1,500 dozen shirts every week from its factory in Johnston, New York. At the same time Kalter-Cerf Mercantile Company operated from the building. The diverse company dealt in shoes as well as operating as jobbers and wholesale auctioneers. Today the handsome building is little changed. As is the case with its former twin next door, the late Victorian storefront at street level is miraculously intact. Art galleries replace shirt manufacturers and a Victoria’s Secret retail store occupies the ground floor where cameras and toys were sold. And passersby would never guess that the building once matched its more pious neighbor before a unique, near-whimsical remodeling of 1900.
108 LEONARD STREET ALSO KNOWN AS 346 BROADWAY, THE CLOCKTOWER BUILDING
SUMIT KAUR GOT IT
Text by Judith Berdy Thanks to Bobbie Slonevsky for her dedication to Blackwell’s Almanac and the RIHS Thanks to Deborah Dorff for maintaining our website Edited by Deborah Dorff All image are copyrighted (c)
Sources
DAYTONIAN IN MANHATTAN
FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
Gurney worked in the jewelry trade in Little Falls, New York, but soon moved his business to New York City and shortly after turned to photography, having been instructed and inspired by Samuel Morse. He was one of the pioneering practitioners of the daguerreotype process, opening the first American photo gallery at 189 Broadway in 1840, and charging $5 for a portrait.
He created remarkably detailed portraits, using to the full the remarkable tonal rendition of the process. He selected his clients from New York’s society elite, calling them “Distinguished Persons of the Age” and eschewing the political and entertainment figures favoured by his rival, Mathew Brady. The quality of Gurney’s portraits soon ensconced him as the finest daguerreotypist in Gotham.[1]
Gurney’s photographic skills received numerous accolades, including a write-up in the Scientific American of 5 December 1846. The New York Illustrated News, in an 1853 article, wrote that his establishment at 349 Broadway “consisted of nine spacious rooms, devoted exclusively to this art.” In the 1840s Gurney showed his images at numerous exhibitions such as the American Institute Fair and later at the Crystal Palace in London, achieving international renown. His business flourished and in 1858 he built a three-story white marble studio at 707 Broadway to house his pictures, and it was the first building built for the sole purpose of photography in the United States.
Gurney played a leading role in the training of the first wave of pioneering photographers such as Mathew Brady, who made a name for himself as a Civil war photographer. Brady had been employed as a journeyman making jewelry cases for E. Anthony & Co., and also made display cases for Gurney’s daguerreotypes.
One of the things Gurney is best known for is having taken the only known photograph of Abraham Lincoln in death.[2][3][4]
Portrait of Jeremiah Gurney (1812-1895), New York daguerrotypist
Gurney’s Daguerreian Saloon at 349 Broadway, NYC
Wedding Party of Julia Parmly and Frederick Billings. Parmly and Ward Family and Friends, April 1862
Two Girls in Identical Dresses”, Daguerreotype, 4 7/16 x 3 1/4 in. (11.3 x 8.2 cm)
Lincoln in open casket by Benjamin Gurney
Bessie Sudlow is the stage name of Barbara Elizabeth Johnstone (22 July 1849 – 28 January 1928), who was active in New York as a burlesque performer from 1869 to 1873, then in Britain as an opera bouffe soprano from 1875 to 1880. This stereo photograph was taken in New York.
-Pair of Portraits of Man and Woman (Husband and Wife?)- MET DP700063.jpg
William Horace Lingard in Drag by J Gurney & Son, NYC.jpg
RIVERSIDE DRIVE VIADUCT FROM 115 STREET. NY CENTRAL RAILROAD BELOW AND G. WASHINGTON BRIDGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ED LITCHER, HARA REISER, ANDY SPARBERG, ARON EISENPREISS, JAY JACOBSON, CLARA BELLA, LAURA HAUSER ALL GOT IT!!
Text by Judith Berdy Thanks to Bobbie Slonevsky for her dedication to Blackwell’s Almanac and the RIHS Thanks to Deborah Dorff for maintaining our website Edited by Melanie Colter and Deborah Dorff
All image are copyrighted (c) Roosevelt Island Historical Society unless otherwise indicated
RIHS (C) FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
As the 19th century became the 20th, Riverside Drive saw the erection of mansions that rivaled those along Fifth and Madison Avenues. Millionaires were lured by fresh area and the breathtaking views of the Hudson River from the high cliffs. Builder Joseph A. Farley got in on the action. The son of Terence Farley, a well-known builder for many years, Joseph went into business for himself around 1895 focusing on the rapidly developing Riverside Drive area. By 1900 he had erected more than 25 houses in the neighborhood between 105th to 108th Streets, and on West End Avenue. In 1901 he began construction on four magnificent houses designed by James & Leo on Riverside Drive between 105th and 106th Streets. They would be his undoing. Farley paid the staggering amount of $160,000 for the building lots alone—about $3.5 million in today’s dollars. The total cost of the project would rise to around $430,000. But the results, completed in 1902, were magnificent. The three mansions facing Riverside Drive were nearly identical—French-inspired townhouses fit for New York’s wealthy upper crust. But the corner house was the show-stopper.
photo by Ephemeral New York
Although the entrance was squarely on West 105th Street, the residence took the more prestigious address of No. 330 Riverside Drive. A grand Parisian mansion, it stretched eastward along West 105th Street and turned a shoulder to its less impressive neighbors. The architects blended exquisitely carved limestone with buff colored brick to produce a restrained and elegant design. Ornamentation was reserved, on the whole, for the window openings while large areas of façade were purposefully left blank. On October 4, 1902 the Real Estate Record and Builder’s Guide praised the homes. “These houses…represent all that is latest in fashionable dwelling construction, and are furnished with all the devices for insuring the convenience and comfort of their occupants, besides being designed with artistic correctness and finished with taste.”
The Real Estate Record & Builder’s Guide published this photograph on October 4, 1902 (copyright expired)
The writer made note of the pleasant location. The houses were “on the summit of a hill, from which the Drive slopes away both north and south. It commands magnificent views of the Hudson River and the Riverside Drive, and is, therefore, airy, cheerful and salubrious.” Financially Farley had stretched himself to the limit to construct the lavish homes. And by the end of the year, when none of them had sold, he was in trouble. On Christmas Eve 1902 The Sun ran the headline “Builder Jos. A. Farley Fails.” The blame for his bankruptcy was placed squarely on the new Riverside Drive houses. “Inability to sell the houses is given as the principal cause of the assignment,” said the newspaper. The mansions, of course, would eventually sell and No. 330 became home to Robert Benson Davis—founder of the Davis Baking Powder Company—and his wife and daughter. When the fabulously wealthy Davis was in his 40s, he had married the teenaged Jennie Weed. The couple had one child, Lucretia, born in 1886. In 1905, a few years after the family moved into the 25-room Riverside Drive mansion, Davis purchased their sprawling country estate “Hillcrest” in Cazenovia, New York.
photo by Alice Lum
By now Robert Davis was aging. The Civil War veteran was 62 years old in 1905 and his wife was 30 years younger. Jennie Weed Davis’s focus was turning away from her husband and to his money. In 1908 Jennie tried to have Davis ruled “of unsound mind.” She had three doctors examine him and she spread rumors to the Davis Baking Powder Company executives that he was mentally incompetent. The New York Times reported that “He objected to that step, and the trouble ensuing resulted in divorce proceedings.” Divorce was not on the agenda of Jennie Weed Davis. When her husband became ill that year, she grasped the opportunity to control him. According to newspaper reports in 1911, he told a judge that “when he was taken sick she ‘usurped’ his business in Hoboken and surrounded him with spies that made of his home a prison.” Jennie intercepted the mail and kept Davis locked in the bedroom on the fourth floor until September 1910. Jennie found Davis’s will and discovered he had amended the terms. She and Lucretia were allotted a yearly stipend from the estate and she was not pleased with the amount. She told Davis “Unless you change this I shall be compelled to allow Lucretia to go on the stage, and you will be responsible if she falls into the many pitfalls of that career and becomes a low woman. It costs $40,000 a year to run the New York house. You must let us have more money after you are gone.” Davis devised an escape plan by dropping a letter addressed to a friend from the bedroom window. As luck would have it, it was found by a passerby and, remarkably, delivered. The ally positioned a motorcar outside the residence and when the servants were taking the dinner dishes out of his room, Davis made his escape. Later The New York Times printed a more dramatic version of the escape. “Disguised as a physician and accompanied by two nurses in uniform, he eluded the hired caretakers.” Jennie initiated a search for her husband, whom she still maintained was incompetent. A special report to The New York Times on September 26, 1910, said “It is understood here that Robert M. Davis, a wealthy baking powder manufacturer, 70 years old, has eluded the efforts of relatives to detain him at his New York home, 330 Riverside Drive, but he has not appeared here [i.e., the country estate].” Davis had fled on a train to Los Angeles and immediately began divorce proceedings based on “cruelty.” On June 13, 1911 Robert Benson Davis took the stand. The Times wrote “Mrs. Davis, appearing at least thirty years younger than her husband, was in the court room. She has a daughter, Lucretia, aged 26. Mrs. Davis’s head wagged in indignant denial at several of her husband’s statements.” Two days after the shocking testimony of imprisonment, guards, spies and threats of his daughter losing her virtue, Davis was denied his plea for divorce because he was not a California resident and the court had no authority. Jennie, almost immediately, filed a suit for “separate maintenance.” She received a monthly allowance of $1,500 as well as $1,500 for costs. That was not enough for Jennie Weed Davis. She countered, asking instead for a $5,000 monthly allowance. An unsympathetic Judge Walter Bordwell, on September 27, 1912 ruled “that Mrs. Davis’s action in driving her husband from his Riverside Drive home…while he was ill, showed conclusively that she was not entitled to any allowance.” Somewhat unexpectedly, with everyone disappointed at their own rulings the family traveled back to New York and continued life in the Riverside Drive mansion. The Davises were seen at their customary box—Box H—at the Metropolitan Opera during Saturday matinees despite the many lorgnettes one might imagine were focused on Jennie. On September 8, 1915 Lucretia Weed Davis was married to George Shipman Jephson in St. Peter’s Episcopal Church in Cazenovia. The newlyweds lived on in the Riverside Drive house and George was given a job at the R. B. Davis Company—as President. Ironically three months later Jennie Weed Davis died. The scheming wife of the millionaire—three decades his junior–did not live to inherit the estate. Her funeral was held in the Riverside Drive mansion on Tuesday, December 28 at 2:30 in the afternoon. Robert Benson Davis lived another five years. On Thursday, February 19, 1920 his funeral, too, took place in the house. Lucretia and George maintained the Davis lifestyle. They lived on in the Riverside Drive and Cazenovia mansions and kept Box H at the Opera.
At the time of Robert B. Davis’ funeral, the neighborhood was only slightly changed — photograph NYPL Collection
With the coming of the Great Depression the grand mansions of Riverside Drive began being divided into multifamily homes or razed for modern apartment buildings. Perhaps to protect the exclusive nature of his block, George Jephson bought the adjoining mansions on Riverside Drive as they became available. At the beginning of 1933 he already owned No. 331 next door (where, by the way, film actress Marion Davies had lived) and in February that year he purchased No. 332. “Mr. Jephson now controls a frontage of 78 feet in a block containing several private homes,” reported The Times on February 8.
On September 30, 1951 George S. Jephson died in the summer house at Cazenovia. Four years later, deciding to live solely in Hillcrest, the aging Lucretia sold the three Riverside Drive mansions to Fred H. Hill. If New Yorkers were concerned that the large parcel would mean the end of the lovely mansions, they heaved a sigh of relief when No. 330 was quickly resold in January 1955 to the Brothers of the La Salle Provincialate. The group, parochial school teachers, planned “to occupy the house for a residence in place of their present living quarters at 112 West Seventy-seventh Street,” reported The Times.
Lucretia Davis Jephson lived on in Hillcrest until her death in April 1979 at the age of 93. Meanwhile, the Provincialate remained on at No. 330 Riverside Drive until 1978. Unlike many of its neighbors, the Davis mansion has never been broken up into apartments. Its stately presence is a reminder of a time when millionaires rebuffed Fifth Avenue for the vistas of the Hudson River.
Text by Judith Berdy Thanks to Bobbie Slonevsky for her dedication to Blackwell’s Almanac and the RIHS Thanks to Deborah Dorff for maintaining our website Edited by Melanie Colter and Deborah Dorff
Sources
DAYTONIAN IN MANHATTAN IVAN BRICE ARCHITECTS
FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
WE CAN EASILY ADD YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY TO RECEIVE THEIR OWN ISSUES DIRECTLY FROM US 6 DAYS A WEEK. SEND US THEIR NAMES AND E-MAILS. THEY WILL SOON BE ENJOYING THEIR OWN COPY AS EARY AS 6:15 IN THE MORNING!
With National Mall Debut of 120 Statues Celebrating Women in STEM
Smithsonian Partners With IF/THEN
To Display the Largest Collection of Statues of Women
Ever Assembled
Credit: Courtesy of IF/THEN COLLECTION Joyonna Gamble-George stands next to her statue in the #IfThenSheCan — The Exhibit. Gamble-George is an American neuroscientist, innovator, and entrepreneur.
The Smithsonian will shake up Women’s History Month in March with a new Women’s Futures Month, a forward-looking celebration of the power of women and girls in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) to shape a better world. To kick off the month, the Smithsonian will present “#IfThenSheCan – The Exhibit,” a collection of 120 statues of women in STEM. On display in Smithsonian gardens and in and around select Smithsonian museums March 5–27, the exhibit is the largest collection of statues of women ever assembled together.
The 120 life-size 3D-printed statues are of a diverse coalition of contemporary women STEM innovators and role models leading a variety of fields, from protecting wildlife, discovering galaxies, building YouTube’s platform, to trying to cure cancer. From Jessica Esquivel, one of only 150 Black women with a doctorate in physics in the country, to Karina Popovich, a college student who produced over 82,000 pieces of 3D-printed PPE for health-care workers in the early days of the pandemic, visitors will come face to face with entrepreneurs, educators, scientists and conservationists who are building the future. Each statue will feature a unique QR code so visitors can learn about these inspiring personal stories.
“These striking 3D-printed figures of remarkable women in STEM careers help us celebrate the incredible impact women continue to make on vital scientific endeavors,” said Lonnie Bunch, Secretary of the Smithsonian. “This exhibition highlights how a more diverse, more inclusive workforce will strengthen our shared future.”
“‘#IfThenSheCan – The Exhibit’ provides the perfect opportunity for us to show that women have successfully thrived in STEM for decades, while also illustrating the innumerable role models young women can find in every field,” said Ellen Stofan, the Smithsonian’s Under Secretary for Science and Research. “Through this exciting collaboration with Lyda Hill Philanthropies, the Smithsonian is furthering our commitment to fostering an environment where all girls know they can make an indelible mark on our future.”
“We are excited to highlight the work of these game-changing STEM innovators and help expand the narrative about who is leading in these fields,“ said Rachel Goslins, director of the Arts and Industries Building. “These women are changing the world and providing inspiration for the generation that will follow them.”
IF/THEN is an initiative designed by Lyda Hill Philanthropies to activate a culture shift among young girls to open their eyes to STEM careers. From tagging sharks, searching for extraterrestrial life, fighting superbugs, to choreographing robots, these STEM innovators were selected through a rigorous process that identified them as leaders in their fields with a commitment to inspire the next generation. All were chosen by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and Lyda Hill Philanthropies to serve as AAAS IF/THENAmbassadors: high-profile role models for middle school girls.
“#IfThenSheCan – The Exhibit” will be unveiled to the public March 5, kicking off the month-long Women’s Futures Month festival with a weekend of exciting programs at the Arts and Industries Building. Programming for the month will invite visitors of all ages and gender expressions to dream big and see themselves as scientists-in-the-making. They will be given the unique opportunity to meet the women scientists and inventors changing the world during a free “Work It! FUTURES Career Day” March 5, and they can enjoy inspiring activities for future-makers of all ages during a “Spark the FUTURES: Science Family Day ” March 6.
During opening weekend, visitors will be able to explore all 120 statues placed in the Arts and Industries Building, the Smithsonian Castle and the adjacent Enid A. Haupt Garden. Starting March 7, select statues will spread out to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History and other locations along the National Mall through the end of the month.
This program is made possible by the support of Lyda Hill Philanthropies and the IF/THEN initiative.
“What inspires someone to dream big, reach further, leap higher?” asked Lyda Hill, entrepreneur and founder of Lyda Hill Philanthropies. “‘#IfThenSheCan – The Exhibit’ was a big idea that we created with the intention to reach young girls to spark their dreams and support their interest in science. We are deeply grateful to the Smithsonian to make these statues accessible to so many in our nation’s capital.”
Really enjoyed meeting Dr. Lataisia Jones, a neuroscientist with @NIH. She brought so much infectious enthusiasm, humility, and expertise with her!
Credit: Courtesy of IFTHEN Collection #IfThenSheCan—The Exhibit,2021
Times Square around 1904. The NY Times building, then brand new, is in the center. On right is the old Astor Hotel, since razed. Believe it was still Longacre Square at the time of the photo. HARA REISER AND ANDY SPARBERG got it right
Funding Provided by: Roosevelt Island Corporation Public Purpose Funds Council Member Ben Kallos City Council Discretionary Funds thru DYCD Text by Judith Berdy
Edited by Deborah Dorff ALL PHOTOS COPYRIGHT RIHS. 2022 (C) PHOTOS IN THIS ISSUE (C) JUDITH BERDY RIHS
Indianapolis circa 1905. “Knights of Pythias Building.” Last glimpsed here, 10 years ago! 8×10 inch dry plate glass negative, Detroit Publishing Company.
This amazing triangular building was designed by Sir Thomas Tresham (father of one of the Gunpowder Plotters) and constructed between 1593 and 1597. It is a testament to Tresham’s Roman Catholicism: the number three, symbolising the Holy Trinity, is apparent everywhere. There are three floors, trefoil windows and three triangular gables on each side.On the entrance front is the inscription ‘Tres Testimonium Dant’ (‘there are three that give witness’), a Biblical quotation from St John’s Gospel referring to the Trinity. It is also a pun on Tresham’s name; his wife called him ‘Good Tres’ in her letters
New York Flatiron triangular building – panoramio.jpg
Gastown Buildings on Cambie Street – panoramio.jpg
Saint-Petersburg. Apartment house of V. A. Ratkov-Rozhnov. Embankment of the Griboyedov Canal, 71.jpg
Boat hause-Shimon Levi house-Tel Aviv.jpg
Shimeon Levi house, 56 Levanda St, Tel Aviv Built 1934-1935 commonly known as “Ship building” Architects: Shimon Hamadi Levi, Arieh Cohen. Bauhaus.
Rue Breguet & Rue Boulle, Paris October 2012.jpg Rue Breguet & Rue Boulle, Paris October 2012.
Triangular office block at London Wall – geograph.org.uk – 643161.jpg
http://P1330656 Paris VI rue de Rennes rwk.jpg
Gebäude Ecke Appelstraße – Herrenhäuser Kirchweg.jpg
Hay Building, Portland, Maine.jpg
Hay Building, also known as the Charles Q. Clapp Building, is a historic commercial building on Congress Square in downtown Portland, Maine. It occupies a prominent triangular site at the junction of Congress, High and Free Streets. Built in 1826.
All image are copyrighted (c) Roosevelt Island Historical Society unless otherwise indicated
WIKIPEDIA COMMONS
RIHS (C) FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
Admittedly a bit of a trick. Anyone who travels knows about JFK, and LGA is known, too, not least for Joe Biden’s comment a “third world airport”. But did “Wrong Way Corrigan” fly out of JFK? How many world flight records were shattered at LGA? There’s only one answer: Floyd Bennett Field. Never heard of it. Stay glued. This is a good tale, and it ends with a mystery.
First, FBF is in Marine Park, Brooklyn, along the shore of Jamaica Bay. It was created by connecting Barren Island and several smaller islands to the rest of Brooklyn with sand pumped from the Bay.
Why? One reason was that Charles Lindbergh did not take off from New York City on his historic solo flight to Paris. The City missed the reflected glow of Lindbergh’s triumph. Unlike other cities such as Atlantic City and Cincinnati, New York didn’t have a municipal airport. New York did have many private airfields, and, in the earliest days of few regularly scheduled commercial airflights, no one thought we needed a municipal field as well.
Several official bodies did recommend that NYC build its own airport, but this was ignored until the construction of Newark Municipal Airport. As the best equipped airport in the area, US Postal Service designated Newark as the airmail terminal for the New York City area. Recall that airline traffic was funded mainly by Washington’s airmail business rather than by passengers. So, we lost twice – the prestige of a new airport and postal funds to support airlines. (This is why the DC-3 was revolutionary, because it carried enough passengers to support a profit-making business.)
In mid-1927, a Washington committee identified six met area locations where an airport might be built. Debate followed, and Congressman (and future mayor) Fiorello La Guardia pushed for a commercial airport on Governors Island, as it was closer to Manhattan and located in the middle of the Harbor. He introduced a resolution in Congress to do this, but it was voted down.
Finally, Barren Island was chosen. Few people lived there, and it was owned by the City which had already spent $100 million between 1900 and 1927 to construct a seaport in Jamaica Bay – the project was abandoned, but land had already been dredged land for shipping channels. No obstructions existed nearby and being on Jamaica Bay would allow seaplanes to use the airport – and seaplanes were the leaders in commercial aviation at this time. Hopefully, the airport would spur development of Jamaica Bay, since the seaport had been dropped.
FBF would be a big deal, top of the line airport, accommodating airplanes and seaplanes. Planners wanted a best rating from the Department of Commerce. In order to secure an “A1A” rating, FBF had the country’s longest concrete runway, an 8-inch-thick layer of reinforced concrete, gravel drainage strips, 200-foot-wide, twice the minimum runway width mandated by the Department of Commerce. Its runways, at a time when most airports still had dirt runways and no night landings, made the airport among the most advanced of its day, as did its comfortable terminal facilities with numerous amenities. These amenities included an underground tunnel for passengers to make their way to the runway without getting wet or windblown
The airport was named after Floyd Bennett, a noted aviator who piloted the first plane to fly over the North Pole and had visualized an airport at Barren Island before dying in 1928. Bennett Field construction started the same year. The airport was dedicated on June 26, 1930, and officially opened to commercial flights on May 23, 1931.
As a commercial airport, FBF never got off the ground. Bennett Field suffered from its poor location in outer Brooklyn. There were no limited-access roads between Manhattan and the airport, and the only direct route from Manhattan to Bennett Field was Flatbush Avenue, a congested street with local traffic throughout its length. This was exacerbated by the fact that the bus-to-subway connection did not occur until 1940.
And airmail. LaGuardia pushed for Floyd Bennett Field to replace Newark Airport as the city’s main air terminal but failed. Since commercial passenger traffic followed airmail, no regularly scheduled commercial passenger airlines were based at FBF. So, in 1933, while Newark carried 120,000 airline passengers, 1.5 million pounds of mail, and 425,000 pounds of express mail, Bennett carried 52 airline passengers, 98 bags of mail, and 100 pounds of express.
But FBF was heavily used by civil aircraft. In 1932, it had become “the most desirable American Field as an ocean hop terminal”. At least four transatlantic flights had occurred there that year, and at least four more flights were scheduled for 1933. By 1933, Floyd Bennett Field accommodated more flights than Newark Airport: 51,828 arrivals and departures, compared to 19,232 at Newark. By number of flights, Bennett Field was the second-busiest US airport that year, behind only Oakland International Airport in California.
Floyd Bennett Field was a perfect spot for aviation pioneers and daredevils to launch their flights, and many trans-continental, trans-Atlantic and round the world flight records were set and broken here. Famous aviators flew here – Roscoe Turner, Wiley Post (the first solo flight around the world, took off and landed here in front of crowds of 50,000 fans), Howard Hughes broke the world record for flying around the world departing from FBF on his Lockheed Super Electra.
Howard Hughes arrives at Floyd Bennett Field. (Photo: Bettmann/Getty Images)
FBF was the finishing line for the Bendix Trophy Race a key transcontinental competition. Women were active aviators here and in the 1936 Bendix Race, women won three of the top five places. Beryl Markham, the Kenyan novelist, and Jacqueline Cochran were prominent women aviators who set records at Bennett field.
Contestants before the 1933 Annette Gipson all woman’s race
Amelia Earhart and Charles Lindbergh took part in FBF events but perhaps the best remembered flight from FBF was Douglas Corrigan’s “mistaken” flight to Ireland on July 17, 1938. Long story, but Corrigan claimed that his planned non-stop cross-country flight in a $325 used plane went awry, and he found himself en route across the Atlantic rather than the continent. Forever, Floyd Bennett Field would be identified with “Wrong way Corrigan”.
In 1938, the Navy, which already occupied part of Bennett Field, began to expand its facilities there. As the Navy operation grew, all private airlines were ordered to leave, and all remaining residents on Barren Island would be evicted. On May 26, 1941, the airport was closed to all commercial and general aviation uses, and a week later, the Navy opened Naval Air Station New York with an air show that attracted 30,000 to 50,000 attendees. During the war, the miliary used FBF extensively.
NAS New York functioned as a support and training base for Naval and Marine units throughout the postwar period. With the Vietnam War over, the military said it would vacate the airport. Mayor Lindsay wanted to convert it to a commercial airport and Governor Rockefeller wanted to make it into a mall, industrial park and housing development. Long story short, Bennett Field became part of the Gateway National Recreation Area’s Jamaica Bay Unit and is managed by the National Park Service.
Now some mysteries. The City’s Department of Docks was responsible for construction. We don’t know who the architect was, but we are told that the admin building (now Ryan Visitors Center) was a masterpiece. The outside of the main building (ae the top) has some Art Deco elements, but on a colonial revival or Neo-Georgian base. The inside design was influenced by Art Deco and Egyptian art, which was an influence on art deco. But I could find no photo record.
The WPA was involved in construction. The City seems to have made some sharp deals. In 1936, the federal government contributed $4.7 million toward Bennett Field’s expansion, while the city spent only slightly more than $339,000.
The WPA was also central in the most interesting mystery. Four large murals with the theme “The History of Flight” were commissioned from the WPA’s Federal Art Project.
The murals were not delivered until May 1940, after the Navy had taken control of the airport. Civic and patriotic groups immediately attacked them as Communist propaganda. They argued, for example, that the murals show the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk in Russian peasant costumes, a likeness of Stalin, that people in another panel seem “strangely un-American in expression and garb” and that they “stand with upraised fists, the Communist salute”. Several reports say that one mural was created by Diego Rivera and that Arshile Gorky was working on another. These seem both highly unlikely.
Another report says that Colonel Brehon Somerveil, WPA Administrator, ordered them taken down and burned for being “socialist propaganda.” (Given Somerveil’s hard anti-communist views, this would not be surprising.) The Times says that Somerveil dismissed one artist on the project (Thomas Corwin) “for preparing Communist propaganda” and dismissed his supervisor for “incompetence” in submitting Corwin’s work.
Alas, we don’t know what the murals actually looked like. Several images can be found, but it’s not clear if these are the Bennett field murals. Both from Wikipedia.
NEW YORK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE YESHIVA UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON HEIGHTS LAURA HUSSEY GOT IT RIGHT!!!
Text by Judith Berdy Thanks to Bobbie Slonevsky for her dedication to Blackwell’s Almanac and the RIHS Thanks to Deborah Dorff for maintaining our website Edited by Deborah Dorff All image are copyrighted (c)
Sources STEPHEN BLANK
All image are copyrighted (c) Roosevelt Island Historical Society unless otherwise indicated
FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
The Technologist, September 1870. Public domain To correct the record, the designers should be identified as Craven, Dearborn, and their colleagues. Given the Water Tower’s distinctive architectural character, it is possible that some uncredited architect also played a role.
“Review of the Design of the Collective System of the High Service Water Works at Carmansville, New York City,” by L.L. Buck, 1868 (Collection of the author.)
Although construction on the Water Tower did not begin until the summer of 1869, its design was completed by the spring of 1868.
We know this thanks to a thesis written at that time by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute student L.L. Buck. It provides dimensions that are consistent with those in Dearborn’s early 1870s plans and its narrative descriptions and calculations are much more detailed than those in news articles or official reports. Who said schoolwork isn’t important?
Among other things, the paper tells us that in the Tower’s interior there “will be a brick lining 8 inches thick and with an air space, between it and the stones of the wall, of 4 inches” and the stairs “are to be of iron, cast treads and wrought frame work in each story to wind from one side around to the opposite side, or occupying 8 sides, the landing on each floor to be vertically over that of the preceding.”
Incidentally, the student, whose full name was Leffert Lefferts Buck, went on to an accomplished career including serving as Chief Engineer on the Williamsburg Bridge.
It Not Only Resembles a Medieval Tower, It Is Built Like One Too
Although built for a functional purpose, the Highbridge Water Tower is an ornamental building often likened to medieval minarets and campaniles (Italian bell towers) and the comparisons have considerable merit, both stylistically and structurally. The architectural connections are obvious, but the physical similarity is not as readily apparent until one ventures inside or looks at architectural drawings.
Built more than a decade before the first steel frame skyscrapers of the 1880s, the Water Tower has load bearing walls designed to support the weight of the building above, including a full water tank. Much like a historic church, it has thick walls at the bottom and thinner ones at upper levels.
Transition from shaft to tank room (now observation level)
Both Buck’s paper and Dearborn’s plans show that at the base the octagonal structure has an outer diameter of 29 feet and walls 5.5 feet thick, leaving only 18 feet inside. Above the base, the main shaft tapers slightly so that the walls are 4 feet thick but the interior space remains 18 feet across. The few windows in the base and shaft are narrow and vertical to maintain the structural integrity.
Exterior of the tank room, now observation level
In contrast, the walls of the tank room, which is now the observation level, only support the weight of the cupola above. They are a much slimmer 1 feet, 4 inches thick and have expansive windows, two on each of the eight sides. As a result, this part of the tower has a more spacious, light-filled interior of 25 feet, 8 inches in diameter.
A silver-plated model of the Highbridge Water Tower, now owned by the New-York Historical Society, bears a lengthy inscription stating that it was presented to John L. Brown, the building contractor, “by the Employees on the Tower Works, as a Souvenir of the pleasant times passed in his employ.” It also lists various City officials, among them William M. Tweed, Commissioner of Public Works. In fact the linkage between the two was more than incidental.
Brown, who the New York Times once referred to as “the Tammany street-cleaner and contractor,” told an investigatory commission in 1872 “I had no connection with Mr. Tweed.” However, “Boss” Tweed acknowledged in 1877 what many long suspected; he held a secret interest in Brown’s street cleaning company and ensured that it received city contracts and payment for work it did not perform. In jail by then, he made confessions like this in an unsuccessful effort to be paroled. As for Brown, he was off the hook, having died a rich man two years earlier.
As for the Water Tower, Brown received that contract in 1867 from the Croton Aqueduct Board, which had autonomy from Tweed and other politicians. However, Tweed, who was infamous for inflating costs on innumerable public works projects to benefit himself and his cronies, most notoriously with the “Tweed Courthouse,” gained control of Croton Aqueduct operations in April 1870 while the Tower was under construction. There is some evidence that similar corrupt practices occurred on a modest scale with the Tower. As for that silver model, it seems more likely a gift from Tweed, known for his affection for luxuries, than from workers paid modest wages.
The Tower’s water system operations ended on December 15, 1949 when it was made obsolete by a new electric powered pumping station at 179th Street and Amsterdam Avenue. The City’s Department of Water Supply, Gas, and Electricity planned to raze the old structure, which had become a target of vandals.
In stepped Robert Moses to the rescue. Yes, really. As the New York Herald Tribune reported in 1951, “the Parks Department said it was the intention of Commissioner Robert Moses to save the 170-foot structure as a historical landmark.” The City formally transferred the Tower to the Parks Department in 1955, along with the High Bridge, also removed from water service in 1949, and a section of the Old Croton Aqueduct.
After the Highbridge Water Tower was placed under Parks jurisdiction, the agency teamed up with the Benjamin Altman Foundation to install an electric carillon. This was a device imitating the sound of bells, allowing a building often compared to a medieval campanile to function like one. It debuted on Memorial Day 1958 with a 15-minute performance broadcast on WNYC radio.
The Altman Memorial Carillon, as it was called officially, chimed thrice daily on weekdays and twice a day on weekends for several minutes from speakers mounted in the old tank room. As Gay Talese of the New York Times observed in 1961, it “has served as a combination concert hall and alarm clock with such fidelity that many residents have let it run their lives.”
How long the five-octave carillon continued to operate is unclear. Periodically there has been talk of replacing it, but when members of the Parks and Cultural Affairs Committee of Manhattan Community Board 12 voted on capital project priorities in 2019, there was no support for this.
Undoubtedly the saddest day in the Highbridge Water Tower’s history is June 11, 1984, when a man broke in, set a fire in the tank room, and jumped to his death. This badly burned the cupola, which had wooden framework, destroyed the carillon, and caused other damage.
FromThe water-supply of the city of New York. 1658-1895. Published 1896.Public domain
In the late 1980s and early 1990s the Parks Department carried out a restoration, which included a new cupola. Although it looks generally similar to the original, there are aesthetic differences, including louvers in the middle section instead of windows. Also, the replacement weather vane has an arrow, whereas old drawings and photographs show something resembling a mythical aquatic creature.
Today, the cupola is reached via a spiral staircase in the center of the tank room though it is off-limits to the public. On the other hand, the original cupola contained a scenic lookout. A vestige of this are markings on the walls indicating the outline of the stairs that extended above the water tank (photo above).
Find out more about these and other facts and stories at our upcoming virtual talk about the Highbridge Water Tower on March 24th at 12 p.m. The event is free for Untapped New York Insiders. If you’re not a member, join now (new members get their first month free with code JOINUS).
A CONNECTION
Looking back on my family history it has much of a connection with today’s events. My maternal grandmother- Esther Silerrglate was born in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1888. My maternal grandfather-Charles Katz was born in Mogilev, Belarus in 1880, while my paternal grandfather-Philip Beridchawsky was born in Balta prefecture of Ukraine in1880. They all emigrated to the US in about 1900-1905 and settled in Philadelphia and Brooklyn.
I have visited the beautiful cities of St. Petersburg and Kiev to splendidly beautiful cities.
Words cannot express my sadness and praise for the people of this country.
GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL ON AUDUBON AVENUE ANDY SPARBERG, HARA REISER, CLARA BELLA GOT IT RIGHT!
Text by Judith Berdy Thanks to Bobbie Slonevsky for her dedication to Blackwell’s Almanac and the RIHS Thanks to Deborah Dorff for maintaining our website Edited by Melanie Colter and Deborah Dorff
All image are copyrighted (c) Roosevelt Island Historical Society unless otherwise indicated
UNTAPPED NEW YORK JEFF REUBEN
RIHS (C) FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
The 200-foot tall Highbridge Water Tower in Washington Heights stands on a bluff above the High Bridge and Harlem River, sharing a park landscape with a swimming pool, baseball field, playground, terrace, and lawns. It is a familiar, if somewhat mysterious landmark for local residents, MetroNorth Hudson Line commuters, and motorists on the Harlem River Drive and other nearby roadways and bridges.
However, when it was completed 150 years ago, its setting and function were quite different. Constructed as an addition to the Croton water system in a then thinly populated area, it was a major catalyst in the transformation of Upper Manhattan into bustling urban neighborhoods.
For many today, its origins and historic role are unknown, but it is time to rediscover this enigmatic icon, which is not only celebrating its sesquicentennial in 2022, but was also recently reopened for tours following a $5 million restoration. In celebration of its return to the spotlight, we present ten secrets of this distinctive structure.
NYC Department of Public Works, Annual Report, 1872. Public domain
When the Croton Aqueduct opened in 1842, providing Manhattan with an abundant source of clean drinking water, the system relied on gravity for water pressure. As a result, northern Manhattan was not served by the system given that much of it is at elevations higher than the reservoirs in Central Park and at 42nd Street. A bit ironic considering that the High Bridge, which carried the aqueduct over the Harlem River., became a defining feature of the area and a popular destination for visitors following its completion in 1848.
The Technologist, Aug. 1870. “High Service Water Works.” (Tower under construction)Public domain
In an era when individual buildings did not have their own water pumps and tanks, a systemic solution was needed. So, the City’s Croton Aqueduct Department added the High Service Water Works to “cure the evil of limited supply to those whose ambition brought them above the level of the reservoir” as the New York Times elegantly phrased it in 1866. The site selected for these facilities was high ground near the Manhattan end of the High Bridge.
The Water Tower was just one part of this. As shown in the historic images above, next to it was a reservoir, opened in 1870, with a storage capacity of nearly 11 million gallons. It was high enough that it provided water pressure to serve 90 percent of the High Service Area; water pressure for the other 10 percent was provided by a 47,000-gallon water tank located inside the Tower.
Next to the High Bridge, there was also a pumping station with a steam engine, boiler, and smokestack to force water up from the aqueduct, a coal dock and shed along the waterfront, and an inclined plane to lift coal up the steep river bank to the pumping station. All except the Tower no longer exist, nor does another pumping station added in the mid 1890s about 1,000 feet to the north.
Morris-Jumel Mansion
Describing the High Service Water Works plans, the New York Herald reported in 1864 that “this is to be done by means of a tower erected on Madame Jumel’s property, at High Bridge.”
This is a reference to Eliza B. Jumel, the American-born widow of French merchant Étienne (anglicized to Stephen) Jumel and ex-wife of Aaron Burr. Residing nearby in the Morris-Jumel Mansion, now a museum, she owned extensive real estate holdings including about seven acres where the City wanted to locate the High Service Water Works.
She offered this land for about $79,000, “to avoid the expenses which the City would necessarily have to incur to ascertain the value of the property.” The City rejected this and pursued an eminent domain taking, resulting in a Court approved compensation of $45,000. This substantial price reduction was a moot point for Madame Jumel; the process was completed in December 1865, six months after she passed away at age 90.
The map above from 1867 shows where the Water Tower and reservoir were to be placed and also indicates property boundaries (dashed lines) prior to the taking, including Jumel’s lands and the City’s aqueduct corridor extending south from the High Bridge.
WHO DESIGNED IT?
Identifying who designed the Highbridge Water Tower is a matter worthy of attention, not least because many sources have credited it to the wrong person.
Contemporary accounts state that the High Service Water Works, including the Tower, were designed under the direction of Alfred W. Craven, who served as the Croton Aqueduct Chief Engineer from 1849 to 1868. Some sources also mention William L. Dearborn, who served as Engineer in Charge from 1862 to 1872. For what it is worth, Dearborn also signed plans for the Water Tower from the early 1870s. “
These extensive works have all been designed under the general direction of A.W. Craven, esq., engineer in chief of the Croton Department, by Wm. L. Dearborn, esq., Engineer in charge.”
New York Tribune, January 14, 1868. “Croton Department: New High-service Reservoir and Water Works at Washington Hights”
However, a century later in 1967 the City’s one-page Landmark Designation report states the Tower is “attributed to John B. Jervis.” One of the giants of American civil engineering history who was Croton Aqueduct Chief Engineer from 1836 to 1848, Jervis oversaw design and completion of the aqueduct and the High Bridge. However, after 1848 he went on to other endeavors and there is no evidence he designed the High Service Water Works. It appears that Jervis’ work on the High Bridge was conflated with the later Tower.
Alfred W. Craven, from Early Columbia engineers, an appreciation. Public domain
In an adult version of the children’s classic “telephone game,” many subsequent sources also state that Jervis designed the Tower, but dropping the “attributed to” qualification. It has become canon.
The Blue Dragon Sculptre by Swedish artists Gustav and Ulla Kraitz located on Roosevelt Island near the entrance to Southpoint Park.
LAURA HUSSEY,GLORIA HERMAN , ALEXIS VILLAFANE AND VICKI FEINMEL GOT IT EARLY!!!
from readers: Not sure if this is a statue made by an amused grandchild of me swimming in the East River, or the wonderful whale statue at the entrance to the South Point Park en route to the FDR Memorial. So sorry to learn of Arline’s death. One of the very wonderful people who have been part of the Rivercross world for many, many years. Do you think that is because of the influence, however subtle, of Nellie Bly? Regards, Jay Jacobson
Below images are from Arline Jacoby
Hi Judy, Thank you so much for remembering me and sending me the information about Arlene. As I was reading the reflections on her, it brought joyful images to mind of when I was involved with RIVAA> She had so much joy and energy when it came to art. A truly beautiful soul. I can still hear her voice and feel her passion. She will certainly be missed. I will attend the memorial tomorrow. Thanks again and sending hugs and warm wishes for a healthy, joyful year ahead for you. Best, Ron Becker, Former Director of Therapeutic Recreation at Coler-Goldwater
Text by Judith Berdy Thanks to Bobbie Slonevsky for her dedication to Blackwell’s Almanac and the RIHS Thanks to Deborah Dorff for maintaining our website Edited by Melanie Colter and Deborah Dorff
All image are copyrighted (c) Roosevelt Island Historical Society unless otherwise indicated
Sources
UNTAPPED NEW YORK
FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
Photo by Judith Berdy One evening there was a meeting at the RIVAA Gallery and Arline came in fresh from an event, I snapped this photo of her next to this artwork, She loved it and used it many times.
Arline Jacoby
Multimedia is my creative language, channeled through painting, sculpting, photography, and printmaking. My work is personal, ranging from classic drawings to timely conceptual themes, such as the Holocaust, verbal abuse, global climate change, obesity, and sexuality. Playful, personal or political, the work touches upon themes of life, death, love, peace, and war.
I strive to provide artistic quality beyond aesthetics, into the realm of contemplation. At my ultimate imaginative depth, my eyes and mind excite one another to achieve complete creative fulfillment. It is essential to uplift my soul, delight my eye, awaken my ear, and speak to my heart, creating an enriching environment every day.
My personal artistic process was developed at the Tyler School of Fine Arts at Temple University and at Adelphi University, where I earned my Master’s degree and membership into the Kappa Pi honor society. I went on to work in the marble yards and foundries at Petrasanta, Italy. I taught at Queens College, Hofstra University, C.W. Post College, Adelphi, and West Hempstead High School, where I was head of the sculpture department for 20 years. I also served as Vice President of the Long Island Art Teachers Association and the President of Roosevelt Island Visual Art Association.
I was awarded a Certificate of Excellence in marble sculpture and won sculpture awards at C.W. Post College and St. John’s University. At a Nassau County-wide exhibit, my monoprints received awards.
To rally the artistic community upon Roosevelt Island has been my dream, and to watch RIVAA Gallery thrive is as beautiful as the art itself. It has ever been my vision that RIVAA will become a major artistic pushpin on the NYC map.
I am an exhibiting artist at RIVAA Gallery and Eveline Luppi Gallery in Wickford, Rhode Island, and have many pieces in private collections around the country.
Last Chance: A Kaleidoscope Of Color On Roosevelt Island
Painted glass panels with splashes of vivid color in the Main Street windows of the RIVAA Gallery hint at the treasures inside.
Arline Jacoby’s exhibition, “Color Outside the Line,” features oil paintings, acrylics, collage, sculpture, monoprints, tile work, and a slideshow of photographs of moments of color – the view of Manhattan from her window, a tangle of seaweed and other plants, a rainbow and more. Hanging strips of brightly painted canvas in a corner of the space – where visitor tend to congregate — create what feels to the artist like a chuppah, or wedding canopy.
Arline’s daughters and niece celebrate her 90th birthday at a party at Gallery RIVAA in September, 2019.
Women who made strides were Ethel Romm., Helen Roht and Arline all whom proudly went forth with great careers before it was easy to do.
The Blintz Club was a gathering of friends usually at Helen Roht’s home where friendship and food mixed so well. Linda Pickett, an original islander, Helen Roht, Maxine Sealy were members along with Arlene. I, being the kid was the serve to the group’s refreshments on Sunday afternoon get-togethers.
Nothing would stop ArlIne from being creative, here at a beading class at the CBN Senior Center.
At the RI Jewish Congregation, ArlIne has been a continual member and celebrating all events from wonderful Passover Seders to our annual Succah. One year she decided to paint the dull gray walls of the Cultural Center with a wonderful grape design to make the utilitarian space so special for our Passover Seder!
ArlIne’s garden brought her joy and a bounty of produce. Fellow gardeners were cajoled into helping her till the soil on many occasions
I first met Arline when she was living in Westview. I remember her donating a Chanukah menorah to the very young RIJC. The menorah fit in a window. Why in the window? Her response was that she wanted to show the people who saw it, was that Jewish people lived here.
Arline has been in my RI life forever. Her presence was something interesting. Whether needing help with a chore or participating a community event Ariine was there. Who else would start RIVAA and get RIOC to donate the storefront? Arline did! She managed to get the RIOC President Robert Ryan to make it happen.
We all have Arline stories . She would call me at 8 p.m. to come to dinner. I would go to her wonderfully cluttered apartment, galley, studio and workspace. Her ceramic pears were in a bowl on the coffee table with all kinds of wonderful artworks of her making scattered all over the apartment. She had rescued glass panels and painted them and now adding a prism of color to the room. Very hard to walk around the room so full of her lives works.
Aline added a glimmer of light to all our lives and she will be missed.
The 200-foot tall Highbridge Water Tower in Washington Heights stands on a bluff above the High Bridge and Harlem
CLARA BELLA, SUSAN RODETIS, ARON EISENPREISS, HARA REISER, LAURA HUSSEY, ANDY SPARBERG all got it right!!!
Text by Judith Berdy Thanks to Bobbie Slonevsky for her dedication to Blackwell’s Almanac and the RIHS Thanks to Deborah Dorff for maintaining our website Edited by Melanie Colter and Deborah Dorff
All image are copyrighted (c) Roosevelt Island Historical Society unless otherwise indicated
FUNDING PROVIDED BY ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION PUBLIC PURPOSE GRANTS CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE BEN KALLOS DISCRETIONARY FUNDING THRU DYCD
“To New York with Love” was a recent supplement to the Sunday New York Times featuring the illustrations of Lauren Tamaki. Check out her website for dozens of wonderful illustrations.
ABOUT THE ARTIST
Lauren Tamaki is a Canadian illustrator who has been living in New York for the past 5 years. She worked as a graphic designer and art director until moving to freelance full time in February of 2015. She draws on a variety of diverse sources for her work, layering inspirations from daily life, fashion and her own imagination.
Her work has been featured in several publications, including The New York Times, GQ and with brands such as Loeffler Randall and Cole Haan. This is the first exhibition of her original works.
There’s a lot of stuff to look at in New York. Here’s some of it.
I miss Canada (a lot) but I’m trying to soak in all the New York I can. NY can be a pain in the ass but the people are truly fascinating and sometimes wonderful. There are times I want to run away to a cabin in the middle of the woods… but then I hear a Mexican woman singing the most beautiful song ever on the F Train or I see Hasidic kids hugging a tree in Prospect Park and I’m back in Canada.
Funding Provided by: Roosevelt Island Corporation Public Purpose Funds Council Member Ben Kallos City Council Discretionary Funds thru DYCD Text by Judith Berdy
All image are copyrighted (c) Roosevelt Island Historical Society unless otherwise indicated
Edited by Deborah Dorff ALL PHOTOS COPYRIGHT RIHS. 2022 (C) PHOTOS IN THIS ISSUE (C) JUDITH BERDY RIHS
